On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Bill Erickson <erick...@esilibrary.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm planning on cutting 2.3.beta2 this Friday 8/17.  Keep the bug fixes 
> rolling!
>
> After that comes the 2.3.rc1 release candidate on August 31st.  I'm not 
> anticipating an RC2, but we can certainly squeeze one in if necessary.
>
> <policy>
> How do we characterize bug fixes that are allowed to be merged between RC1 
> and GA?  I assume we should limit to showstoppers only?
> </policy>

IMO (and likely debatable), we shouldn't cut RC until showstoppers are
in, and post-RC bug fixes should be limited to low-impact or
high-priority fixes.  Thoughts?

-- 
Mike Rylander
 | Director of Research and Development
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  mi...@esilibrary.com
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com

Reply via email to