Thanks for doing that Alexy!

Regards,
Justin Hopkins
Manager, Information Technology
MOBIUS Consortium Office
c: 573-808-2309

--sent from a mobile device--

On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:22 AM, "Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> I took the averages of the responses for each bug/feature and ranked them. 
> This is what the result looks like:
>
> 1. Copy Location Search when scoped to a particular org unit - 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084732
> 2. Public copy notes - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1013817
> 3. Bib records without copies appear to patrons in the OPAC. Bib records 
> without copies do not appear in a gray band in the staff client so that staff 
> know that these records do not have copies. - 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084753
> 4. Metarecord searching (aka "group formats and editions") - 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084740
> 5. Search Range - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084742
> 6. Some added content components have not been re-integrated
> 7. Metarecord holds - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1053397
> 8. Spell check - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084734
> 9. Authority browse: should be added as a new tab in advanced search. - 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1000957
> 10. Toggle to increase/decrease font size - 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084758
> 11. Rewrites from JSPAC to TPAC to preserve old links going to new interfaces.
> 12. Widget-based access to all configured search indexes
> 13. Accurate links from RSS feeds/unapi display - the dynamic details link 
> from the unapi display continues to go to the jspac record. - 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1089479
> 14. Check for password strength at login and force change if password is weak 
> - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1013786
> 15. Advertise OpenSearch so that users can automatically add a search widget 
> for the catalog to their browser.
>
> My CSV file attached.
>
> Aleksey
>
>
>
> On 2013-01-11, at 10:34 , "Peters, Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Good morning, all.
>>
>> Attached you will find the results of the JSPAC blocker survey.  Please let 
>> me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Michael Peters
>> Indiana State Library MIS | Inspire.IN.gov Helpdesk | Evergreen Indiana 
>> Helpdesk
>> office - 317.234.2128
>> email - [email protected]
>>
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peters, 
>> Michael
>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 8:15 PM
>> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List; Evergreen Discussion Group
>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] JSPAC removal blockers, what 
>> and which are they?
>>
>> Just 11 responses so far today, so I don't think anyone will flood the vote 
>> ;)
>>
>> I will be out all next week but will try and find a time to save off the 
>> spreadsheet and send it to the list.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rogan 
>> Hamby
>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:13 PM
>> To: Evergreen Discussion Group
>> Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] JSPAC removal blockers, what 
>> and which are they?
>>
>> So long as no one tries to rig the vote I don't think there is a big danger. 
>>  If multiple staff in a consortium are involved in the community, are aware 
>> of it and respond I think that is right.
>>
>> Now, if I were to say broadcast the form around SCLENDS and get everyone to 
>> respond to it to never watches the mailing lists and has no idea what the 
>> PACs are that's wrong.  I swear to not do that by the way despite living 
>> formative years in Miami Dade where there is a long tradition of the dead 
>> voting.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Sharp, Chris <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Hi Yamil,
>>
>> I don't see any reason to limit voting.  I think this poll is meant to be a 
>> "finger on the pulse" type measure rather than anything officially binding.  
>> One of my GPLS colleagues and I have already voted and she and I probably 
>> don't even have the same perspective on the ranking, for instance.  I think 
>> as broad a net as possible will indicate people's overall preferences.
>>
>> Just my two cents!
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Yamil Suarez" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Evergreen Development Discussion List" 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: "Evergreen Discussion Group" 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:34:07 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] JSPAC removal blockers,      
>>>   what and which are they?
>>>
>>>
>>> Should we limit our votes to one vote per consortium/system/branch,
>>> or
>>> should we have an extra field stating if we are voting as an
>>> individual or representing an institution?
>>>
>>> Thanks for putting this all together,
>>> Yamil
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Peters, Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>> As Mike R suggested, I've created a simple Google form where you
>>>> can
>>>> rank the 15 "missing" features from 1 to 15, with "1" being the
>>>> most
>>>> important feature to your organization.  We'll give everyone some
>>>> time to rank these, then average the values to find the rankings of
>>>> importance.
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHNXYVpXZ3NtWnFoYWN1RlN0TThIOEE6MQ
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy!
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Mike Peters
>>
>> --
>> Chris Sharp
>> PINES System Administrator
>> Georgia Public Library Service
>> 1800 Century Place, Suite 150
>> Atlanta, Georgia 30345
>> (404) 235-7147
>> [email protected]
>> http://pines.georgialibraries.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------
>> Rogan Hamby
>> Headquarters Manager, York County Library System
>>
>> "You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit 
>> me."
>> -- C.S. Lewis
>> <JSPAC Features Missing from TPAC - Sheet1.csv>
>
> Aleksey Lazar
> PALS
> IS Developer and Intergrator
> 507-389-2907
> http://www.pals.org/
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> <JSPAC Features Missing from TPAC - Sheet1_RANKED_lazar.csv>

Reply via email to