That's great, thanks for reviewing this bug! I've also updated it with additional findings.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Rylander Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:38 AM To: Evergreen Development Discussion List Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Possible issue with authority to authority linking w/ authority records that contains multiple 5xx entries? Srey, I've updated the LP entry with a fix for this and another bug. I ran into it this morning. --miker On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Srey Seng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Just wanted to check in again, and see if anyone (familiar with the > authority to authority linking process and is knowledgeable about how > the resulting links should be formed, both within the authority marc > record and the authority linking table) has had a chance to review this bug. > > > > Thanks! > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Srey Seng > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 3:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Possible issue with authority to authority > linking w/ authority records that contains multiple 5xx entries? > > > > Hello, > > > > Just wanted to throw this potential issue out there and see if anyone > has also observed this behavior. > > > > 1. An authority record with multiple 500 entries only gets the first > entry linked (even when there are named authority records available > for the rest of the 500 entries) > > 2. What gets linked, actually links to the wrong named authority > record > > > > LP bug that contains more details and screep captures: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1312945 > > > > Thanks! -- Mike Rylander | Director of Research and Development | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
