Hi all, Galen - congratulations again on being RM for the next release!
> I will note that by saying "3.0" I'm running with the version number I > suggested in my release manager proposal. While I don't want to open > the door to any extended discussion about version numbering, if you > both feel strongly about using a different version number (with 2.10 > being an obvious alternative) and feel that it is worth our collective > time to debate the matter, please speak up. I think the criterion for a "3.0" release is pretty straightforward. If the web client will be fully usable in all major functionality (Circulation, Cataloging, Administration, Acquisitions), with multiple printer options and standalone in place and easily installable by a reasonably experienced Windows administrator, we should call it 3.0 and have a big splash news release about it. If not, I think we should go with 2.10. I agree that beating the dead horse of release numbering in general is not productive, but as with 2.0 several years ago, 3.0 should mean more than "that number was next". -- Chris Sharp PINES System Administrator Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (404) 235-7147 [email protected] http://pines.georgialibraries.org/
