Hello all, Since our project adopted the idea of "release managers" in 2012, we have managed to select each by consensus. While we typically had elections, the nominees until now have always run unopposed.
I find this tradition to be a beautiful thing, and one I would like to see preserved for as long as possible. As such, I am withdrawing myself from consideration for the RM role for 3.0. While I believe strongly in the value of competition, I feel that unity is of even greater value for a community of our size. I hope instead that I might be considered for management of the 3.1 release. It seems that my vision for the 3.0 release is perhaps better suited for a 3.1 release in any case. Sincerely, Dan
