Hi Ben, Are you referring to the bug where copies cannot be edited after a part has been assigned? If so, that bug has been fixed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1739271
Kathy On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 12:53 PM Benjamin Kalish <bkal...@forbeslibrary.org> wrote: > Hopefully this is missing from the webstaffblocker list because it's > already been fixed, but I couldn't confirm that on launchpad. We've had an > ongoing problem where item status changes made from "Edit Item Attributes" > in the web client are not saved, and the only workaround we've found at my > library has been to use the XUL client. We've submitted this bug to our > consortium (CW MARS) but I don't know for sure whether or not it was ever > submitted on LaunchPad. It is a big deal though! If it hasn't been fixed > than I honestly don't know what we would do without access to the XUL > client. > > Benjamin Kalish > Forbes Library / 413-587-1012 / bkal...@forbeslibrary.org > > Support Forbes Library: > > - Consider giving a gift <http://www.forbeslibrary.org/giving> to > Forbes Library > - Vote for the Friends of Forbes in the Florence Bank Community Grant > Program <https://www.florencebank.com/vote>. > - Join the Friends the Forbes today > <https://forbeslibrary.org/friends/>! > > > Currently reading: *Guastavino Vaulting: The Art of Structural Tile* by > John Ochsendorf > Just Finished: *There's a Mystery There: The Primal Vision of Maurice > Sendak* by Jonathan Cott > > For information about accessibility at the library, please see: > http://forbeslibrary.org/accessibility/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kathy Lussier <kluss...@masslnc.org> > wrote: > >> Thank you for that assessment Galen. I'll note that the bugs that gave me >> the biggest concern were in the small category. The type to selection bug >> is indeed a big issue, particularly for large consortia who have to >> navigate through a large list of libraries. But my largest concern are with >> those bugs that don't have a good workaround aside from performing the >> action in the xul client. >> >> Kathy >> >> -- >> Kathy Lussier >> Project Coordinator >> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative >> (508) 343-0128kluss...@masslnc.org >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:23 PM Galen Charlton < >> g...@equinoxinitiative.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here's my classification of the current open bugs tagged as >>> webstaffblocker: >>> >>> Small (i.e., likely can be fixed in two weeks) >>> --------------------------------------- >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1773191 Untranslatable Last >>> Billing Type values >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1770959 Web staff client: >>> strings translated via staff client are displayed untranslated >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1781641 Web Client: Cannot >>> Override Patron Message Block >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1781235 Web Client: >>> Sometimes Unable to Change Primary Patron Barcode within "See All" Box >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1746536 web client: cannot >>> edit vol/call number in item status >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1745427 Web Client: Serials >>> - Predict New Issues Defaults to Previous Pattern >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1552778 Web client check-in >>> "effective date" and check-out "specific due date" should also include >>> times >>> >>> Higher-effort >>> ------------- >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1511742 webclient: Need >>> ability to type to selection in some menus >>> >>> Patch exists, may need some tweaks >>> ---------------------------------- >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1755258 webclient: LDAP not >>> working -- but works for stand alone client >>> >>> Overall, I think we can reasonably hope to resolve these over the next >>> couple weeks, although I specifically want to call out LP#1511742 as >>> the one bug that I think will require the most effort. >>> >>> Consequently, I am +1 for planning on disabling the XUL client in 3.2, >>> especially in light of plans for extending the support period for 3.1, >>> but do think that this decision needs to be evaluated and finalized at >>> the end of the upcoming bug-squashing week. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Galen >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:57 AM Bill Erickson <beric...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> Devs, >>> > >>> > I'd like to have an informal vote on whether we should remove (well, >>> disable) the XUL client in 3.2. Delaying the decision is complicating the >>> release process. If it's clear which way the wind is blowing, we can set a >>> date for the final vote and patching. >>> > >>> > Knowing what you know today about outstanding webstaff blockers (a few >>> were just added), would you vote to proceed with XUL removal? Can I get a >>> show of hands, yea or nay? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > -b >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Galen Charlton >>> Implementation and Services Manager >>> Equinox Open Library Initiative >>> phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) >>> email: g...@equinoxinitiative.org >>> web: https://equinoxInitiative.org >>> direct: +1 770-709-5581 >>> cell: +1 404-984-4366 >>> >>