+1 for PG 9.6 for EG 3.4. -b
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:06 AM Daniel Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's a third vote for upping to 9.6. We've been on 9.6 on Ubuntu 16.04 > since December. No complaints. > > Dan > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:33 AM Boyer, Jason A <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I would also shy away from making 10 the minimum for 3.4 because I worry >> that we haven't shaken out the last compatibility issues, but I think we >> should definitely aim for 10 or 11 for 3.5. I've been running 9.6 in >> production since November so I would say it's a pretty safe choice to carry >> us through 3.4. After our local upgrade to 3.3 I'm planning to hammer on >> U18.04 and Pg10 more thoroughly. >> >> Jason >> >> -- >> Jason Boyer >> MIS Supervisor >> Indiana State Library >> http://library.in.gov/ >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Open-ils-dev [mailto: >> [email protected]] On >> > Behalf Of Jason Stephenson >> > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 3:41 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Time to increase the minimum required >> version of >> > PostgreSQL? >> > >> > **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open >> attachments or >> > click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** >> > ________________________________ >> > >> > Galen, et al., >> > >> > I think it is too soon to require Pg 10. While we advertise Evergreen as >> > working with Pg 10, we don't actually install it on Ubnuntu 18.04 via >> > the prerequisites. We install Pg 9.6 instead. >> > >> > We've found a few places already where set returning functions have >> > caused us hangups in Pg 10. I suspect that there are more of these >> > hanging about in the database and in the storage and possibly other >> > code. I've been meaning to do a lot more testing with Pg 10 lately, but >> > I've been busy with other things as well. >> > >> > I think we should add a more comprehensive test suite to exercise all of >> > the database code, including that in the Perl. I know this overly >> > ambitious, and I don't have a lot of time to spare to work on it, >> > myself, so it's easy to say, isn't it? >> > >> > Anyway, I don't have a problem with making Pg 9.6 the minimum required >> > version for Evergreen 3.4, even thought that means that I will have to >> > upgrade Pg as well. >> > >> > Just my thoughts, >> > Jason >> > >> >>
