Hi Josh, The short version is that you'll want to use the output of asset.patron_default_visibility_mask()'s c_attrs column to test the vis_attr_vector column of asset.copy_vis_attr_cache for copies attached to the records in question. It gets more complicated if you want to check visibility of records at a specific location. You can look at how the search query does that for more details.
(Short because I have to run, sorry! Hope that pointer is helpful to start.) -- Mike Rylander | Executive Director | Equinox Open Library Initiative | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://equinoxinitiative.org On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:23 AM Josh Stompro <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, I just saw bug #1831803 [1] about removing asset.opac_visible_copies > which jogged my memory that I need to change how our OCLC holdings update > scripts work in the future. > > > > Does anyone know if there is a write up/conference presentation on how the > asset visiblility / biblio.record_entry.vis_attr_vector stuff works? I want > to select all bib records of physical items that show up in the catalog for > the public by default. > > > > Thanks > > Josh > > > > > > 1 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1831803 > > > > > > Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org > > Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139 > > LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110 > >
