On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Bill Ott<[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> >> >> Does that help? If so, I'll put this on the DocBook docket. > > A big Yes here. I started this discussion here a few weeks back but left it > with an, "I'll see what I can find out about the relevance adjustments..." > Which I hadn't gotten back to. > >
Thanks, Bill. I have been working on an XML section for search relevance today in fact, since it makes a good "working document" for decision-making as I plow through the draft of the Evergreen DocBook XML styleguide. 1. If anyone who knows this could respond at some point, what kind of numeric adjustments are allowable for config.metabib_field? I.e. floating multipliers, integers, etc.? 2. I would be most pleased if someone could send me a text or csv version of config.metabib_field (no emergency, just "sometime"). Mike Rylander kindly emailed me the whole table but I couldn't scrape it out of email in a usable format, and I thought presenting the entire table somewhere in the documentation would be useful. Mike also sent me the search.relevance_adjustment table, which doesn't have all those prolix xpath statements so is much narrower, and was simple to reformat. 3. If any of you out there have built a glossary database such as is described in Stayton's "DocBook XSL: The Complete Guide," chapter 17, I could use some help figuring out exactly where the glossentry elements go. /headscratch -- -- | Karen G. Schneider | Community Librarian | Equinox Software Inc. "The Evergreen Experts" | Toll-free: 1.877.Open.ILS (1.877.673.6457) x712 | [email protected] | Web: http://www.esilibrary.com _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
