Whatever... Karen S
Sent from my iPhone On Dec 22, 2009, at 6:32 AM, Dan Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 05:42 -0800, K.G.Schneider wrote: >> Dan, are you asking for a re-vote? If so, I suggest continuing with >> the vote and letting the balloting language stand as-is; it is clear, >> and allows some procedural latitude. >> > > Karen, was it clear to the community that they were voting to make the > code in the docs available under a license that's incompatible with > the > existing OpenSRF / Evergreen code bases, until those code bases > themselves adopt the GPL v3.0? > > For the amount of code that will be in the docs, that's probably fine, > and the author can make that code available under both the GPL v2 > (with > the "or later" redistribution clause) so that it can also be > redistributed with the OpenSRF & Evergreen code bases, as well as the > GPL v3.0. > > So if we go ahead with licensing the code in the docs under the GPL > v3.0 > using the unmodified proposals, then that's what I'll do with the code > in http://evergreen-ils.org/~denials/workshop.html and other authors / > developers, being reasonable sorts, will probably do the same. > > _______________________________________________ > OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
