Hi, On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Soulliere, Robert wrote: > I did have a question as to whether we wanted to separate 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 > into 2 versions of the documentation or keep them in the same manual version > with notes regarding features specific to 1.6.1? I am not quite sure about > the implications of doing it either way in regards to merging changes to > these documents across branches in the repository.
Since, roughly speaking, the documentation for 1.6.1 would be the 1.6.0 documentation plus a chapter on booking, keeping them together would be OK if it is more convenient for DIG. However, that wouldn't work for 2.0, since there will be a long period of time where some libraries will be running 1.6.x and others 2.x, so separate versions of the manuals would be a good thing. Of course, multiple versions can be maintained in the same Git repository using different branches. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Data Services Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source email: [email protected] direct: +1 352-215-7548 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
