Yes, let's coordinate something. We have 2 demos set up in multi-server and stand-alone flavours of stable release. I like bleeding-edge I would like to take on the master - do you want to run that on Ubuntu11.10Beta? I have one test box running that already, though we don't use anything as unstable as that for production.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Lori Bowen Ayre <[email protected]>wrote: > Okay then, let's coordinate. I know Brian is currently hosting two > versions. I've asked him to keep one semi-bleeding but maybe it isn't as > bleeding edge as you need. Also one with the most current stable release. > And we're willing to provide either of these versions to someone for > testing (in addition to what we keep up for demo purposes). > > I want to make sure our efforts aren't wasted but I'm not sure how best to > get guidance. Maybe there is more going on than this thread? Is the IRC > where its at for this? > > Help us be helpful please. > > Lori > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Dan Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Lori Bowen Ayre wrote: >> > How many test servers do we need? >> > >> > Lori >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Wolf Halton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Y'all, >> > > >> > > Lyrasis would like to offer a pro bono test server for beta testing. >> > > What are the resource requirements? >> > > >> > > Wolf >> >> Well... as many as there are different and incompatible needs? >> >> For example, Jeff Godin asked in the #evergreen channel today whether >> there was a publicly available server offering the Template Toolkit OPAC >> interface because he was interested in doing a performance comparison >> between the JSPAC and the TPAC. The TPAC does not run on Evergreen 2.1, >> so a "bleeding-edge" server that could be used for testing and early >> documentation of features in development could be a useful contribution >> to the community. Having it scripted so that it reinstalled itself with >> a fresh checkout of OpenSRF and Evergreen and loaded a base set of data >> would also serve as a nice early warning system. >> >> Right now I think there's room for the following supported releases: >> >> * 1.6.1.x >> * 2.0.x >> >> And the forthcoming next stable release: >> >> * 2.1.* >> >> As well as the bleeding edge: >> >> * master >> >> I can't guarantee that the servers would get tons of use; I concur with >> Robert that many of us are running our own development environments - >> but I do see a use case. >> _______________________________________________ >> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation > > -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
_______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
