On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Soulliere, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lori, > > Thanks for all your work in this area. Speaking as someone in the DIG, I > think this will be exceptional in helping us fill in some of the > documentation gaps for developers and some of the more advanced > administration functions. If you look at our documentation outline: > > http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs_2.2:outline you will > see a whole section for "Developer Resources" . > > I think compiling notes and information on the wiki is a great idea for now. > Also note that AsciiDoc is now the preferred format for documentation > submissions to DIG. ASciiDoc is a lot easier than DocBook XML and used in the > code for the README Installation instructions etc.... > > If you could have finished documentation submitted n AsciiDoc that would be > great! Also, if you want us to being compiling the documentation on what you > have on the wiki, that would also work. In short, we can either try to > extract the documentation from the wiki and format the content or you can > submit the finished product in AsciiDoc or a mixture of both processes.
I have some potentially useful information on developing the TPAC at http://bzr.coffeecode.net/2011/tpac_tutorial/ - it does not yet dive into how we're loading up the context objects from Perl but is a suitably licensed starting point at least. _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
