Hi, Robert --

Asciidoc is fine with me:  I'm partial to ascii-based markup
languages, also (I use markdown to write most of my docs).

As far as creating a branch goes, I have rights to push to the working
repo, but not to the documentation repo (as far as I know).  Which
repo is it where current work is being done (is it still
Evergreen-DocBook)?  Would you prefer that I clone the repo to my area
in github, and let everyone know when I have a document ready? (That's
the way I did most of my work for the statistical category
enhancements.)

I see that the SITKA document is a bit more current:
http://docs.sitka.bclibraries.ca/Sitka/current/html/lsa-statcat.html

Do you have a contact name/email for someone at SITKA I could reach?

thanks,

-- Scott

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Soulliere, Robert
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Creating a branch and having us merge your changes as you have described is 
> definitely a good way to go.
>
> One note on our documentation. As of version 2.2 we have changed to asciidoc 
> (http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/manpage.html)  as the official 
> documentation format base. If you are writing docs specific to version 2.2 or 
> later, you might want to write your documentation in ascidoc format.
> You will notice that the master branch of our documentation is all in ascidoc 
> when you clone our repo, so you might want to write the documentation in 
> asciidoc if possible. We will accept docBook format if that is your 
> preference and that is still the official format of for documentation 
> contributions for 2.1 and earlier as you have seen in the branches.
>
> I am not sure about whom to collaborate with for updating content. SITKA was 
> the original source for the documentation for that chapter and they have 
> since updated their documentation, so they might be a good starting point. 
> Perhaps, those more familiar with the content of this chapter can provide 
> more guidance?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Robert Soulliere, BA (Hons), MLIS
> Systems Librarian
> Mohawk College Library
> [email protected]
> Telephone: 905 575 1212 x3936
> Fax: 905 575 2011
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott 
> Prater [[email protected]]
> Sent: March 25, 2012 3:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] proposal: update "Statistical Categories    
>   Editor" document
>
> I've made some changes to the Statistical Categories Editor interface,
> documented here:
>
> http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev:proposal:patron_statistical_categories
>
> and I'd like to contribute documentation for the new features.
>
> It looks like the latest public version of the document is here:
>
> http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.0/draft/html/lsa-statcat.html
>
> and it appears to be out-of-date, as there are more fields now, and
> the layout has changed somewhat.
>
> What would be the best approach for submitting an updated document?  I
> see that there's a git documentation repository, with
> Docbook-formatted documentation in it.  Should I clone that
> repository, create a branch, update the document in the branch, and
> open a Launchpad bug when the updated document is available?
>
> Also, the work I did is for patron statistical categories;  there have
> been other changes made to the statistical categories editor besides
> mine since this draft version of the documentation.  With whom should
> I collaborate to get an updated version of this document together?
>
> thanks,
>
> -- Scott
> _______________________________________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>
> This E-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message.  If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible
> to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
> is prohibited.  If this communication was received in error, please
> notify the sender by reply E-mail immediately, and delete and destroy
> the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
_______________________________________________
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation

Reply via email to