I wonder if the Evergreen Oversight Board or Communications Committee could 
help us make the decision on the legality of using the images at KDE? I don't 
have a comfortable feeling about using it based on what I have read on the KDE 
site. However, if I get a thumbs up from the  Evergreen Oversight Board, then I 
would feel at ease and would use the image. Since the DIG had been using a 
questionable image for the past few years, I would like to be sure about the 
image choice. If there is any doubt, then I think we need to use the current 
safe PDF image currently in place.

Thanks,
Robert



Robert Soulliere, BA (Hons), MLIS
Systems Librarian
Mohawk College Library
[email protected]
Telephone: 905 575 1212 x3936
Fax: 905 575 2011
________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yamil 
Suarez [[email protected]]
Sent: May 7, 2012 7:20 PM
To: Documentation discussion for Evergreen software
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] PDF icon: licensing concern & fix

On May 7, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich wrote:

> Got it.  This is where it's at: 
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/
> .  There is licensing information, and various icons of various
> sizes.  The PDF icon is titled application-pdf.png and is in a
> "mimetypes" folder for a given size.
>
> Alexey Lazar
> PALS
> Information System Developer and Integrator
> 507-389-2907
> http://www.mnpals.org/
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 16:15 , Yamil Suarez wrote:
>

Cool, this is getting us closer, though the copying license attached
to the icons in that collection seems to be only "GNU Lesser General
Public License v. 3 (LGPL)". This could be an issue since our
documentation is CC-BY-SA and not LGPL, but I know there are some
similarities between the two.

Here is the license listed for set of icons Alexey sent in:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/COPYING?view=markup

I am just trying to play it safe, and would welcome the input from
others more familiar with these type of licensing issues.

Yamil
_______________________________________________
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation

This E-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible
to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
is prohibited.  If this communication was received in error, please
notify the sender by reply E-mail immediately, and delete and destroy
the original message.
_______________________________________________
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation

Reply via email to