Here is the initial proposal and response from Dan Scott.

Tim

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Dan Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Robert:
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Soulliere, Robert
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I set up Documentation processing for Evergreen  2.3. This is in “Alpha
> mode” and available for review.
> >
> > It is available in the “Under Development” section of our documentation
> launch page:
> >
> > http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/
> >
> >
> > I also added an outline page for folks working on content to update
> progress on chapters and sections:
> >
> > http://www.open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs_2.3:outline
> >
> > You might notice a number of “Can this be pulled from 2.2 content?”
> notes in red.
> >
> > The content for those chapters are already in 2.2 and are easy to pull
> into 2.3. All I need is for content authors or developers who are familiar
> with the content or development of the features in these chapter to
> indicate “yes” using the outline or the DIG list or launchpad.  Then, I can
> pull it in.
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't think this is a sustainable model. I think we
> have to assume that all of the 2.2 content should be pulled into 2.3,
> and then deal with the exceptions as they arise. Beta-testers can open
> bugs against the documentation if they find discrepancies between what
> is documented and what they see in the beta release, but they can't do
> that if there's no content to look at.
>
> Perhaps as part of the Launchpad "pullrequest" and the review process,
> we could start flagging areas of the documentation that need to be
> changed as new features are added, or as old features are deprecated?
> _______________________________________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
>



-- 
Tim Spindler
[email protected]

*P**   Go Green - **Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's
really necessary.*
_______________________________________________
OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation

Reply via email to