On Nov 7, 2012, at 15:45 , Dan Scott wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:33:33PM +0000, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I was wondering if Apache for Evergreen still needs to run as >> opensrf:opensrf, or if opensrf:www-data is now acceptable? Newer >> installation instructions for 2.3, for example, only specify to change >> APACHE_RUN_USER to opensrf, not the APACHE_RUN_GROUP. >> >> Is anybody running Apache as opensrf:www-data, or is this an omission >> in the documentation? > > Conifer runs Apache as opensrf:www-data - I don't think it has ever > needed to run as opensrf:opensrf, as long as either the group or the > user have the ability to read and write to particular file locations. > Perhaps you could point at the part of the documentation that concerns > you?
Well, in that case there is nothing wrong with the current installation documentation in this regard: Section 7.4: http://evergreen-ils.org/documentation/install/README_2_3.html#_configure_the_apache_web_server Documentation for version 2.0 used to instruct to run apache both as opensrf user and opensrf group: Section 12.d: http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.0/draft/html/serversideinstallation.html#serversideinstallation-ubuntudebian > The bug that you opened (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054178) after > the brief discussion at > http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/2012-September/007471.html > is tracking your request to try to remove the need for running Apache as > the opensrf user (or group) at all, and > https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1068912 offers one piece of > that puzzle (albeit towards a larger overall goal). I haven't seen that one. I can't wait until I can aptitude install evergreen. Alexey Lazar PALS Information System Developer and Integrator 507-389-2907 http://www.mnpals.org/ _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
