Thanks for your work on this, Lynn! I have a few suggestions.
* Can we make all questions optional? I hate being forced to answer questions on surveys, as there's usually some question I don't understand or don't care about. * I find question #4 hard to understand, and a little hard to use. Question #3 gives us plenty of feedback to work with, so I think we could remove question #4. But if we keep it, I think we should rephrase it to something like "Please rank your choices from the Question #3, with 1 being your preferred source of help". * If we keep question #4, the choice "Evergreen's official online documentation" should match the similar choice from #3, "Evergreen's official training documentation" (not sure which is preferred; I'd probably choose the "online" one). * In question #8, I think we should capitalize HTML (just like PDF and EPUB). Again, thanks for helping push this effort forward. Remington -- Remington Steed Electronic Resources Specialist Hekman Library, Calvin College http://library.calvin.edu/ From: OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lynn Floyd Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 3:37 PM To: 'Documentation discussion for Evergreen software' <[email protected]> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Test Documentation Reorg survey with changes I am sending out a test survey with all the changes that were discussed. If I do not hear back with any suggestions or corrections I'll send out the actual survey to the General, Documentation, and Developers listserv in the morning. This is a test version of Evergreen Documentation Requirements Survey, a survey I designed using SurveyMonkey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/survey/preview?r=true&sm=H1BBJcAOBy_2BZVh9536O26LGeXa_2FRXAxxBFjvZZn2V5lLL6HKaHnbMP9RpgwlCPdF I've sent you this test version so you can preview the survey.
_______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
