2009/2/5 Stuart Miller <[email protected]>:
> I can't speak to the specific needs of K-12, but I DO have an opinion about 
> your questions: - Is the assumption that an open ILS installation will be 
> cheaper
> hosted solution true or should our librarians not assume that Free Software 
> means cheaper software? We would very likely be looking to have this solution 
> hosted.
>
> Most advocates for open source do NOT claim that it saves money. Rather, it 
> allows you to redirect expenditures to more productive uses, allows for 
> competition for your support dollars, and eliminates what can be a very high 
> initial license fee for a new system. That said, you still might be able to 
> reduce IT costs--but like everything else, it depends.

Agreed. In working through our project costs, I would say that the
total cost of operation (TCO) is probably a wash, but the potential
return on investment (ROI) with an open source solution is much
greater than with a proprietary solution. And if, after a couple of
years, you determine that the ROI is not meeting your expectations,
you can drop your support contract but continue to use the product.
(Well, in a hosted situation that may not be true... but then you're
balancing the cost to employ and train someone to care and feed for
your ILS in-house vs. paying experts to do it for you - lots of
tradeoffs to consider.)

> You can obtain Koha or Evergreen for "free" in the sense that do not pay an 
> upfront, one-time initial license fee such as you paid for Horizon. If you 
> choose to support your open source system, you will save the annual 
> maintenance you pay for Horizon. However, my guess is that you will want to 
> continue to contract for support from Equinox or LibLime, the two companies 
> currently offering support for Evergreen and Koha.

Actually, LibLime no longer claims to support Evergreen. A company
called "PTFS" claims to offer support for Evergreen, but as far as I
know they have never contributed to the project or demonstrated any
competence with Evergreen so I would personally be wary of their
ability to follow through. Given that Equinox has done and is doing
the bulk of the development work on Evergreen, I would find it hard to
recommend any other company for support services.

-- 
Dan Scott
Laurentian University

Reply via email to