Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestion of using the shelving location. It seems to be the
proper way to do it.
The collection codes are used to keep a collection that was brought in as a
whole together under one name. Items are not always placed together. So it is
important to link the code to an individual item. We want to know if the
shelving location connects to a marc 21 field (852 c).
We have another question concerning the library tree. In our case we have this
situation: We are an institution incorporating 10 libraries. The libraries do
not physically exist. The cataloger must be able to catalog the material of all
these libraries using one workstation.
Can we do:
Branch 1: IISH
Sub-Library 1:IISG
Sub-Library 2:NEHA
Or should we use:
System 1:IISH
Branch 1:IISG
Branch 2:NEHA
Or System and Sub libraries?
We are not really sure what the System does.
Marjolein
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Etheridge
Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 16:31
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] sub libraries
> I would suggest using shelving locations for collection codes, as they
> are a closer conceptual match unless you have 1300 physical locations.
Another option may be to use a statistical category.
How do you use these codes? For reporting purposes? Do they
influence circulation or hold behavior?
--
Jason Etheridge
| VP, Tactical Development
| Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
| phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: [email protected]
| web: http://www.esilibrary.com
