> A person's name isn't exactly "private" or "sensitive" information to begin > with, although a case could (but I don't think should) be made for their > email address/name combination. Still, I don't think that someone's name > shows up associated with an action they actually took warrants editing the > archives because they regret taking the action.
Just a counterpoint, there is a belief that some library vendors can and will "punish" customers who are seeking software alternatives, and I can sympathize if some lurker mistakenly posts on the list. Of course, there's nothing preventing folks from subscribing to these lists anonymously. -- Jason Etheridge | VP, Tactical Development | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
