In our configuration at least, copy level holds don't appear to have any particular precedence in getting items to fill a specific hold.
That was one very nice aspect of our previous ILS holds workflow. So, what we really need is the v.2.1 "top of the queue" idea. In the meantime, however... :-) Lindsay Stratton Training Coordinator Pioneer Library System 2557 State Rte 21 Canandaigua, NY 14424 www.pls-net.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elaine Hardy" <[email protected]> To: "Evergreen Discussion Group" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:01:08 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Item "Recall" function? Jason, My understanding from someone who had done this is it does take precedence, or at least it did in 1.4. Some PINES libraries apparently used it often to bring items back once they were stuck supplying holds elsewhere. Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager Georgia Public Library Service, A Unit of the University System of Georgia 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235-7128 404.235-7201, fax [email protected] www.georgialibraries.org http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/
