Hello Lori, There may be other cases where "Patch Available" would make sense, but at least for this case, I think "Under Development" is our best bet (if such a category already exists). The patch which is available is quite old, and is really more of a starting point than something which can simply be applied and run without some additional tinkering.
Thanks, Dan -- ********************************************************************************* Daniel Wells, Library Programmer Analyst [email protected] Hekman Library at Calvin College 616.526.7133 >>> On 7/27/2011 at 11:53 AM, Lori Bowen Ayre <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe we need to create new category called "Patch Available" or something > like that? > > Lori > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Anoop Atre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As a middle ground I'd say it's "Under Development" and once accepted into >> the core (or should it be when available in a release version) we set it to >> "Supported". >> >> Cheers >> >> >> On 07/27/2011 10:41 AM, Dan Scott wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lori Bowen Ayre<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, thanks for the clarification Dan. So, based on what you've said, >>>> I'm >>>> updating the Evergreen feature summary some of us are working on to "LDAP >>>> supported." I've added it as feature SA537 (System Admin 537) in case >>>> anyone wants to review it. >>>> >>> >>> I'd say no, LDAP isn't supported, because Dan Wells' patch is not part >>> of the core Evergreen code. >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Anoop Atre >> IS Developer & Integrator, MnPALS >> PH: 507.389.5060 >> OF: 3022 Memorial Library (Office-ML 3022) >> -- >> "Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens" >> ~ Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller >>
