+1 from me. Thanks Dan!
Kathy On 4/30/2012 5:03 PM, Turner, Jennifer M wrote:
+1 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rayner, June Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:01 PM To: 'Evergreen Discussion Group' Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Recording of "Update from Evergreen Oversight Board" and "Update from Developers" +1 Thanks Dan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Scott Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 3:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Recording of "Update from Evergreen Oversight Board" and "Update from Developers" Hi folks: Those of you who made it to Saturday's early-morning update sessions may or may not have noticed the small black ball with the glowing red light on one of the front tables near the projector. That was my microphone, set up to capture the audio from the "update" sessions in the morning. I did make an announcement at the start of the "Update from the Evergreen Oversight Board" meeting that the sessions were being recorded, but there were many people who filed in after that point in time who might not have been aware that the session was being recorded. And, as the visioning exercise that Lori led went on, it's quite possible that people would have forgotten about the ongoing recording. So - while I would like to make the recordings available so that those who weren't there would be able to catch up, I'm hesitant to release the visioning exercise / discussion section of the Oversight Board meeting because I don't think we have explicit consent from everyone who participated. Therefore, I'm proposing that I upload the two "update" sessions, sans the intermediate discussion section. Can I get a +1/-1 on that? Thanks, Dan P.S. A takeaway for future conferences might be that we should have a "sessions might be recorded with audio and/or video" blanket notice& posted signage?
