Hello Tim, Correct. Just trying to capture some essential purchase details in more streamlined way.
George ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Spindler Sent: May 1, 2012 10:34 To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Acquisitions issues George, I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. The workflow diagram says that if you are not ordering through EDI, print the order. If I understand you correctly, you may have a situation where you orderd on Amazon but you will also be maintaining a separate record in Evergreen Acquisitions and simply never print a purchase order because Amazon would not accept it. Is that correct? Tim On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Duimovich, George <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: One thing we'd like to see improved with the current workflow http://goo.gl/5AhcP is an option for more streamlined electronic orders (e.g. When "Provider accepts electronic orders" = yes). The basic use case is where electronic orders are accepted but not via EDI -- instead, just classic credit card order via direct web through sites like Amazon and so on. This is partly a documentation issue (not clear what to do as you walk through this use case for the first time since "Yes" above points to EDI only in the workflow diagram) but there probably could be some UI improvements to streamline cases where you are working via online web orders and get immediate feedback about order and shipping status and don't need to print or send out a purchase order, etc. George George Duimovich NRCan Library / Bibliothèque de RNCan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Kathy Lussier Sent: April 30, 2012 17:13 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Acquisitions issues Hi all, I'm taking this opportunity to be loud on a couple of acquisitions problems we've encountered. We have two consortia that are going live on Evergreen in less than a month. This morning, I sat down with the acq people at one consortium to identify the issues that will be most problematic for them when they go live. I'm hoping we can work to get these issues resolved so that the transition to acquisitions in Evergreen can go as smoothly as possible. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/969494 describes a problem where using the "Add to Purchase Order" option from the View/Place Orders interface does not carry over the PO's provider to that lineitem. Consequently, the PO cannot be activated. We have several libraries who do not plan to use selection lists, and fixing this problem will make a big difference in their workflow. * I also added a new bug today for problems we encountered when trying to activate a PO as part of the order record upload process. https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/992108. Since the workaround for this isn't too onerous (uploading directly to the PO and then activating), it probably isn't as high of a priority as my first item, but it is still fairly important. * We also are having ongoing problems with EDI order responses. From the acquisitions discussion Saturday morning, it sounds like nobody is working with order responses. We are committed to putting in some of the legwork to try to figure out what the problems are and to get order responses working properly so that acquisitions can become a more attractive option for other Evergreen users. However, we have encountered some problems that I suspect might not be bugs, but may be related to configuration issues, and we just need to know where to start looking to resolve these problems. I sent something to the list regarding this issue earlier this month, http://markmail.org/message/gjn4eiadi7s55jdt, but I'll try to provide more detail below. We have been working with a vendor that has been posting test order responses. We have been able to successfully translate these order responses two times, and both times occurred on the day after we performed an Evergreen update on our test system. Afterwards, we get an error in our EDI messages every day. It seems as if the system keeps trying to translate that same message that had already been successfully translated after our Evergreen update. The status of these messages is trans_error. The error message is: EDI Translator edi2json failed, Error 2: Uncaught exception Input/output error in method edi2json The EDI Message Body is: UNB+UNOA:3+1697978:31B+3075052:31B+120328:1751+00000000000011++EANCOM'UNG+ORDRSP+1697978:31B+3075052:31B+120328:1751+00000000000007+UN+D:96A'UNH+00000000000007+ORDRSP:D:96A:UN:EAN008'BGM+231+148+29'DTM+137:20120313:102'RFF+ON:148'NAD+BY+20N6885::91'NAD+SU+1697978::31B'LIN+166+5+9780060186944:EN'PIA+5+0060186941:IB'QTY+21:1'PRI+AAF:22:CA:SRP'RFF+LI:148/166'LIN+167+5+9780142437261:EN'PIA+5+0142437263:IB'QTY+21:1'PRI+AAF:7:CA:SRP'RFF+LI:148/167'LIN+168+5+9780152052201:EN'PIA+5+0152052208:IB'QTY+21:3'PRI+AAF:6.95:CA:SRP'RFF+LI:148/168'LIN+169+2+:EN'PIA+5+:IB'QTY+21:1'QTY+12:0'FTX+LIN++200:1B:28'PRI+AAF:5:CA:SRP'RFF+LI:148/169'LIN+170+5+9780345475800:EN'PIA+5+0345475801:IB'QTY+21:1'PRI+AAF:14.95:CA:SRP'RFF+LI:148/170'UNS+S'CNT+2:5'UNT+36+00000000000007'UNE+1+00000000000007'UNZ+1+00000000000011' Any thoughts on where we can start troubleshooting this? Thanks! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 756-0172<tel:%28508%29%20756-0172> (508) 755-3721<tel:%28508%29%20755-3721> (fax) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier -- Tim Spindler [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> P Go Green - Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary.
