The Library setting 'Cap Max Fine at Item Price' would also seem to apply
in this case. The description appears to match what you're looking for:
'This prevents the system from charging more than the item price in overdue
fines'. It's there for 2.2+ at least.

Mark Cooper
Sonoma County Library

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:54 PM, George Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, it got moved. As I recall, originally, the Max Fines limit was tied
> to the library facility and found under library location editor, or
> something like that.
>
> George Tuttle
> Computer Services Librarian
> Piedmont Regional Library System
> 770-867-2762 x113
> 770-891-0654 (cell)
> 770-867-7483 (fax)
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:58 PM
> To: Evergreen Discussion Group; George Tuttle
> Cc: 'Evergreen Discussion Group'
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Max Fines Limit
>
>
> George,
>
> If you set a max fine amount to 100 and under Is Percent to TRUE I
> think that will do what you want and then use that Circ Max Fine Rule.
>   This is under Admin -> Circulation Max Fine Rules.
>
> In database it's just as straight forward.
>
> Rogan
>
> Quoting George Tuttle <[email protected]>:
>
> > Can someone give me a quick overview on how one configure the Max-Fine
> level
> > (the maximum fine for an item)? Is it possible to cap the Max-Fine at the
> > price of the item so overdues won't exceed the price?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > George Tuttle
> >
> > Computer Services Librarian
> >
> > Piedmont Regional Library System
> >
> > 770-867-2762 x113
> >
> > 770-891-0654 (cell)
> >
> > 770-867-7483 (fax)
> >
> >  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > littleone
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ----------------------
> Rogan Hamby
> Manager Rock Hill Library & Reference Services
> York County Library System
>
> "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
> too dark
> to read." - Groucho Marx
>
>

Reply via email to