Mike, If you were to set up such a thing (maybe just a google form?) and hijack any bug-specific threads with a reminder of it, I think that would be great.
--miker On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Peters, Michael <[email protected]>wrote: > Another crazy idea…**** > > ** ** > > What if we surveyed everyone and allowed groups to rank importance 1 to 10 > (or however many we have) and then we could aggregate an idea of which > features people see as the biggest impediment to upgrading so developers > can work on those highest ranked first?**** > > ** ** > > Example:**** > > ** ** > > *Bug Name Rank Importance (1 to 10)* > > Spell check is missing 10**** > > Copy Location Search is Missing 1**** > > ** ** > > Sincerely, > Michael Peters > Indiana State Library MIS | Inspire.IN.gov Helpdesk | Evergreen Indiana > Helpdesk > office - 317.234.2128 > email - [email protected] **** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lori Bowen > Ayre > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:54 PM > *To:* Evergreen Development Discussion List > *Cc:* Evergreen Discussion Group > *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] JSPAC removal blockers, what and which are > they?**** > > ** ** > > Dan,**** > > ** ** > > I think your flu-influenced idea is great. I do believe that Launchpad is > an impediment if you want more opinions and anything you can do to put the > word out over the General Discussion list will get a much wider audience.* > *** > > ** ** > > Maybe a little JSPAC backgrounder email to explain to non-devs what is in > the works would help generate some interest as well....**** > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Dan Scott <[email protected]> wrote:*** > * > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:21:36PM -0500, Mike Rylander wrote: > > Well, do don't really know, exactly. But, thanks to Kathy Lussier and > Ben > > Shum, we learned at the dev IRC meeting this week that we have a good > > starting point. It lives at > > > http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev:opac:template-toolkit:plan#jspac_features_missing_from_tpacand > > each feature now has a Launch Pad bug.**** > > <snip>**** > > > > What we need from everyone that can spare a few minutes are data and > > opinions, and the best way to offer both is on the Launch Pad bugs linked > > from the above wiki page. Please take a moment to scan that list of > JSPAC > > features not yet in the TPAC, find the one that looks important or > > interesting to you and your institution, follow the link to the LP bug > and > > leave a comment after having read the description and any previous > > comments. Even if your comment is, "we don't care about this feature and > > are planning to move to TPAC with or without it," that is important > > information to have.**** > > <snip> > > > Questions, comments or concerns? > > If adding comments to bugs in Launchpad is a barrier for participation > (having to sign up for an account, etc), then posting to the mailing > list would be helpful too, IMO. > > Also, in the unlikely event that Kathy and Ben missed something that > matters to you in the current round-up of missing features, feel free to > raise that! > > Dan > > P.S. crazy flu-influenced idea - we could push one JSPAC removal bug to the > mailing list each day to solicit feedback, so that everyone is looking > at the same bug at approximately the same time...**** > > ** ** > -- Mike Rylander | Director of Research and Development | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
