You are correct, how the volume is represented in the call number has no effect 
on the monographic part. In EG our migrated items have the volumes in both the 
suffix (we migrated them there) so these are technically in the call number and 
in the monographic part field. We copied the suffixes there. These are 
identical only because of the migration. Items created in EG have only the 
monographic part. If a library wants to also put something in the call number 
or a suffix they can do so and it can be different from the Part.


Janet


Janet Schrader
C/W MARS Inc.
Supervisor of Bibliiographic Services
67 Millbrook Street, Suite 201
Worcester, MA 01606
tel: 508-755-3323 ext. 25
fax: 508-757-7801
[email protected]


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hardy, 
Elaine
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:56 PM
To: 'Evergreen Development Discussion List'
Cc: 'Evergreen Discussion Group'
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Planned Parts Development

Do you mean that the call number has the vols represented differently or that 
your labels for monographic parts are different? I thought that how the vol was 
designated in the call number didn't mater to the monographic parts?

Elaine
________________________________

J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects & Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304

404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.georgialibraries.org<http://www.georgialibraries.org>
www.georgialibraries.org/pines<http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines>

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim 
Spindler
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Cc: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

Elaine,

We have an issue from our migration where parts are represented in multiple 
ways (v. 1, vol. 1, volume 1, v1, etc.).   With this development, access to 
this would still be controlled by a permission so each implementation would 
decide who has permissions to make changes on this.

Tim
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Hardy, Elaine 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hope I'm wording this correctly. We haven't implemented Monographic parts 
because of the need to retrospectively change volumes so I may not be 
interpreting the functionality that exists correctly.

I have always thought that creating monograph parts should be done at the 
consortia rather than the individual library level. In order for it to work, 
all consortia members should use the same part label (retaining their own 
volume designation within their call number). Have you considering, rather than 
Pt 2 merging labels changing it to making managing parts permissions at the 
consortium level rather than the local level? That would solve the duplicate 
label issue and move the management further up the hierarchical structure. This 
would essentially control the part label vocabulary.

As a corollary, though not part of your request, to me creating call number 
prefixes and suffixes should be at the library system level and not at the 
consortium level. At least in PINES, call numbers are the responsibility of the 
local library.

Elaine
________________________________

J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects & Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304

404.235-7128<tel:404.235-7128>
404.235-7201<tel:404.235-7201>, fax
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.georgialibraries.org<http://www.georgialibraries.org>
www.georgialibraries.org/pines<http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines>
From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Tim Spindler
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 11:38 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

We are looking for comment on the proposed development.  Attached is the 
specification.

--
____________________________
Tim Spindler
Manager of Library Applications
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
508-755-3323 x20<tel:508-755-3323%20x20>
IM: tjspindler (AOL, meebo, google wave)

C/W MARS, Inc.
67 Millbrook St, Suite 201
Worcester, MA 01606
http://www.cwmars.org


P   Go Green - Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really 
necessary.





--
Tim Spindler
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


P   Go Green - Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really 
necessary.


Reply via email to