A few months ago our libraries were reporting the same issue under Evergreen 2.2.1. I was never able to reproduce the problem and it's been quiet for several weeks.
Bob Wicksall Systems Administrator Pioneer Library System 2557 State Rt. 21 Canandaigua, New York 14424 Voice: (585) 394-8260 Fax: (585) 394-1935 ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aimee Hirschel" <hirsc...@upperskagit.lib.wa.us> > To: "Evergreen Discussion Group" <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org> > Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 5:21:30 PM > Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Asynchronous checkins > > We've been having the same problem in 2.2 with items appearing to be > checked > in but aren't actually. This happens consistently with the > audio-books, > periodicals and DVDs. It does happen to books but no to the same > extent. > We do not have the asynchronous checkbox selected > > Aimee Hirschel > Upper Skagit Library > P. O. Box 99 > Concrete WA 98237 > 360-853-7939 > > -----Original Message----- > From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org > [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf > Of > Kathy Lussier > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:46 PM > To: Evergreen General Discussion List > Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Asynchronous checkins > > Hi all, > > I was wondering if somebody could tell me what the purpose is of the > Fast > Entry (Asynchronous) check in option. My understanding is that it > allows > staff to quickly check in items without waiting for a response from > the > server for each checkin. If it's used, does the system suppress > transit > slips and alerts? What happens if there is some disruption in the > network > connection and the checkin isn't ultimately successful? Will the > system > provide some kind of sign to that user that the checkin wasn't > successful? > > Is there anyone who has been using it regularly and, if so, what has > your > experience been with it? > > Since one MassLNC consortium upgraded to 2.3, they have had repeated > reports > of items that were scanned in, but were ultimately never checked in. > We > haven't pinpointed it yet, but, in many cases when this report was > made, the > asynchronous checkbox was selected. I'm wondering if others have had > a > similar experience. > > Thanks for any insight you might be able to provide! > > Kathy > > -- > Kathy Lussier > Project Coordinator > Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative > (508) 343-0128 > kluss...@masslnc.org > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier > > >