A number of the things in that survey appear to be PINES-specific and
not applicable to the community at large. This includes things such as
"legacy" stat cat information, collection language implications
(primarily english with a large spanish subset, it looks like), and
mention of things like IntraPINES.
Overall I think the survey needs to be re-worked from a more neutral
standpoint if the community is supposed to be involved.
Thomas Berezansky
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
Quoting [email protected]:
Hello, everyone,
The PINES Reports Working Group is working on requirements for a new reports
interface for Evergreen. We hope to streamline and simplify the process for
running basic daily reports so that front-line staff and directors can get
the information they need quickly and independently of technical staff. (The
new interface will not recreate or replace the existing reports interface.)
Now we need your help!
Please help us identify what information is most needed by front-line staff
and directors by completing the following 15-20 minute survey by Friday,
March 8th:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/BQKTGRX
If you would like to review the questions before beginning the survey,
please see the following PDF:
http://pines.georgialibraries.org/files/EG%20New%20Reports%20Interface%20Sur
vey.pdf
Any inquiries about this project, can be sent to:
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
Many thanks,
Cristina
--
Cristina Hernandez Trotter
Head of Reference Dept. and Heritage Center
Oconee Regional Library System
801 Bellevue Ave.
Dublin, GA 31021
478-272-5710 (phone)
478-272-0524 (fax)
<http://www.ocrl.org/> www.ocrl.org
