Ah, OK. bshum++ -b
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Ben Shum <[email protected]> wrote: > For reference, the issue has been filed to Launchpad here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1170514 > > -- Ben > > > On 04/22/2013 12:53 PM, Mary Llewellyn wrote: > > Hi Bill,**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for the response. Ben did some troubleshooting at this end and > found the fault was not in my settings but in our stars..er…tables? He > posted about it on Launchpad.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks so much for getting back to me.**** > > ** ** > > Mary**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Bill Erickson > *Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2013 11:58 AM > *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group > *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: [Evergreen-catalogers] Need Batch > Import advice**** > > ** ** > > Hi Mary,**** > > ** ** > > I can confirm you don't need a match set for 901c matching. **** > > ** ** > > You are seeing a value in the "Import Failures" column in the grid view? > What do the failures say?**** > > ** ** > > Also for reference, the Match Score for the matched bibs (clicking on > matches(...)) will show a value of 9999 when a match occurs via 901c. *** > * > > ** ** > > -b**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Mary Llewellyn <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > I posted this on the catalogers’ list, but the crickets are deafening. > Maybe someone on this list can help me?**** > > **** > > Mary**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mary > Llewellyn > *Sent:* Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:36 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Evergreen-catalogers] Need Batch Import advice**** > > **** > > Hi all,**** > > **** > > I’m having trouble with what ought to be the simplest type of batch load. > I exported and edited a number of records and want to reload them with my > changes. I know I want to use “Merge on Exact Match (901c)”, but I can’t > seem to get the records to import. I’ve tried it with and without a Record > Match Set (I set one up matching only on the 901c when loading without a > Record Match Set didn’t work). I used the Overlay/Merge Profile “Full > Overlay,” which uses the 901c. **** > > **** > > In all attempts at loading, the queue shows that the matching bib was > found, but I can’t get the import/overlay to take place. There are 600 bibs > in the queue, and 600 Record Import Failures. I must be missing something, > but am at a loss at this point. This shouldn’t be so hard.**** > > **** > > Any advice?**** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > **** > > Mary**** > > **** > > **** > > Mary Llewellyn**** > > Database Manager**** > > Bibliomation, Inc.**** > > Middlebury, CT**** > > [email protected]**** > > **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- **** > > Bill Erickson**** > > | Senior Software Developer**** > > | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)**** > > | email: [email protected]**** > > | web: http://esilibrary.com**** > > | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source**** > > ** ** > > > -- > Benjamin Shum > Open Source Software Coordinator > Bibliomation, Inc. > 32 Crest Road > Middlebury, CT 06762203-577-4070, ext. 113 > > -- Bill Erickson | Senior Software Developer | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://esilibrary.com | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
