On 07/09/2013 05:06 PM, Tina Ji (Project Sitka) wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Good enhancements! > >> 1. Support for Conditional Negative Balances > > A quick question: from the use case, can I infer that the starting date > for the three LSE interval settings is the xact_finish or last payment > date (partial payment)? This is different from the Void Lost Max > Interval, which starts from the due date. I think the last payment date > makes more sense.
Yes, it would be the date of the payment or xact_finish. In most, but not all, cases these should be the same. > >> 2. Support for Lost & Paid Status >> 3. Void Lost Fees for Claims Returned Items > > To confirm whether the overdue fines will be restored and/or generated > based on the Claimed Returned date in accordance with the related LSE > settings. That question has not come up in any of the discussions to date. I had not really considered it. I see claims returned as a bit different than the typical case that would cause the lost fees to be voided, such as checking in the lost copy. There is also no way to enter a date for when the patron claims they returned the copy. Dare I say it? There could YAOUS to control the behavior with overdue fines and claims returned lost items. > > > Thanks > > > Tina Ji > 1-888-848-9250 > Trainer/Help Desk Specialist > BC Libraries Cooperative/Sitka > > -- Jason Stephenson Assistant Director for Technology Services Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
