Bill, My thinking is that the vol.2 needs to show up in the Part Designation subfield not the Call Number field. Is that not right?
Don On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bill Erickson <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Don, > > With this setup, you would ultimately get a copy with call number "BV176.G37 > 1999vol.2". Is that what you're going for or is there something else you > expect/want to happen? > > -b > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Donald Butterworth < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Acquisitions Gurus, >> >> The scenario. >> I have a bibliographic record that describes a two volume set. >> We are purchasing just volume 2 of the set. >> We are using a the 962 field to supply Order and copy data to Evergreen. >> >> The question. >> Is it possible to supply the volume information so that it creates a >> correct copy record? >> Would adding the volume to the call number accomplish this? >> >> Example. >> =962 \\$aBV176.G37 1999vol.2 >> >> Don >> >> >> -- >> Don Butterworth >> Faculty Associate / Librarian III >> B.L. Fisher Library >> Asbury Theological Seminary >> [email protected] >> (859) 858-2227 >> > > > > -- > Bill Erickson > | Senior Software Developer > | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) > | email: [email protected] > | web: http://esilibrary.com > | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source > > -- Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury Theological Seminary [email protected] (859) 858-2227
