On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, McCanna, Terran < [email protected]> wrote:
> More thoughts on catalog integration... > > - All the feedback I've received from our staff so far express a strong > preference to keeping the catalog view that is in the staff client as close > as possible to the public OPAC view. > Duly noted. > > - Although you're not working on the cataloging phase yet, catalogers > switch back and forth between the MARC view and the catalog view of a bib > record when creating it / working on it to make sure it will display > properly when patrons view it through the OPAC, so please keep that in mind. > Do we see this as materially different from having the MARC view open in one browser tab and the catalog view open in another? > > - Staff say that in an older version of the staff client, there used to be > visual cues on the search results to indicate when a bib record was hidden > from the public view (because it had no copies attached, because all copies > were lost or missing, etc.) so that staff could readily tell what they were > seeing that patrons could not see. This was lost in one of the upgrades. Is > that something that can be re-enabled for the browser client? I would suggest opening a LP ticket for this, if there isn't already one, since it's (presumably) a feature that was lost with the move to TPAC. Thanks, Terran. -b -- Bill Erickson | Senior Software Developer | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://esilibrary.com | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
