So is the edit items/vols, then a way to change the call number on one copy attached to the volume, thereby creating a new volume and transferring that item to it? That is not what I would expect from something called that. I would expect to be able to edit the item attributes and call number at the same time, as Jennifer did. I'm not sure what I would call it, given space limitations but I can definitely see the confusion. As you and Kathy are describing it, the functionality is great since otherwise you would have multiple steps to create a new vol, then transfer the items.
Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax [email protected] www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines -----Original Message----- From: Open-ils-general [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Etheridge Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 4:22 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Problem with Edit Items / Volumes per Bib function? Should we expect for all copies on a volume to inherit a call number "tweak" if just a single copy was being edited as the entry point? An answer of No went into the mindset that built the current behavior. -- Jason Etheridge | Community and Migration Manager | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
