I think that is the main problem…few people care about Browse indexes so no feedback as to whether they are actually working or not since they, probably, rarely get used.
I only got the 710 (non-t) to work and had that before I posted the first time. Still no joy on the 710’s with a “t” and guessing I’m going to see the same problem as I work through the rest. Was curious if anyone noticed they don’t work as they are implemented, assuming I understand what is supposed to be happening, and if anyone had fixed them. Sounds like you had a problem, and fixed it, that I am not seeing, which only confuses things a bit more J Thanks again. Maybe whoever developed this feature is reading and will chime in… Jim From: Open-ils-general [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Blake Henderson Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 3:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Browse Indexes - 710 Jim, I didn't do any experimenting with the 710. We did not receive any complaints or any interest in the 710. I noticed that the 700 and the 710 were right next to each other in the LOC xslt definition and had the exact same selector query and therefore offered our solution to the 700 as a possible solution to the 710. It looks like they are both treated exactly the same in the LOC xslt template. Glad you got it figured out! -Blake- Conducting Magic MOBIUS 573-234-4513 877-312-3517 On 10/9/2015 2:58 PM, Jim Taylor wrote: Appreciate the reply….oddly our 700 (non-t) tags didn’t need any work. I made the 710 (non-t) tags work by adding <role> <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm> </role> since it looks like it requires a role for the index but the 700’s seems to indicate the same thing but they work without a role. Needless to say it is a bit confusing from where I stand. So your 710’s with a subfield “t” show in your Author browse index without any tweaking? Jim From: Open-ils-general [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Blake Henderson Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Browse Indexes - 710 Jim, We had this same issue. Be design, the mods32 xlst from LOC contains this line: <xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[@tag='700'][not(marc:subfield[@code='t'])]"> (we addressed the 700 instead of the 710 but the solution is probably the same) We updated that line in the xlst to: <xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[@tag='700'][marc:subfield[not (@code='t')]]"> This makes it match the stock Evergreen indexes even with the presence of the subfield "t". Furthermore, we wanted to include the 700t in our title index. So we created an index: INSERT INTO config.metabib_field ( field_class, name, label, format, xpath, search_field, authority_xpath, browse_field, browse_sort_xpath ) VALUES ('title', 'alternative_700t','Title Alternative (700t)', 'marcxml', $$//marc:datafield[@tag='700']/marc:subfield[@code="t"]$$, TRUE, null, TRUE, null); Hope this helps! -Blake- Conducting Magic MOBIUS 573-234-4513 877-312-3517 On 10/8/2015 4:23 PM, Jim Taylor wrote: I am wondering if there is anyone using the Browse Indexes and, if so, have you verified that the 710’s with a subfield “t” and without (they are handled differently) are working. As far as I can tell they will not work as configured in Evergreen right out of the box. I have gotten the 710, without a “t”, to work, with a little tweaking, but still no luck with the 710 with a “t”. I am reasonably sure this isn’t limited to the 710’s but am working down the list trying to make sure all the indexes are working and are configured correctly and this is the current problem. So, if, you know, your 710 browse indexes work and you are willing to share the mod32 xslt from the config.xml_transform table I would greatly appreciate it. Unless you know of some other reason the indexes aren’t working by default…I supposed Evergreen could be configured by default to not have the 710’s work but that doesn’t seem likely since they are part of the mod2 transformation and the index configuration seems appropriate??? In any event, any information that could point me in the right direction would be appreciated. Thank you. Jim
