Hello, I'm just curious if this is currently possible.  We have one system that 
wants to fill their holds in FIFO order, but also wants holds from any of their 
branches to have priority over holds from other systems.  It seems to me that 
all the owning location aware proximity sort options would prioritize based on 
a specific owning location.

What they don't want is any one hold for their patrons to be prioritized over 
another hold for one of their patrons.  I think the hprox, htime and shtime 
would all give priority to holds that have the same pickup lib as the item 
owning location.  They float all items, so the owning location doesn't really 
mean anything to them.

We don't really want to use soft boundaries and the depth sort order because we 
don't want there to be restrictions set at the time the hold is placed.  We 
want the system to be more flexible.  But maybe I'm not understanding how that 
works, and it would do just what I'm asking?

Maybe there could be a new sort option,  hpprox , Owning Library parent to 
pickup library parent proximity with no adjustments?
Josh

Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org
Josh Stompro     | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139
LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110

Reply via email to