I successfully run such a report monthly.  Will provide details when next in 
office on Tuesday unless someone provides info before then

Jspaulk

> On Dec 30, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Dawn Fritz <dfr...@bapl.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Our library started using Evergreen this past October and I'm having problems 
> with a similar report. I need a report which shows which patrons have reached 
> the $25 mark the previous day. I can get a list of patrons who had a bill 
> added the previous day, but I can't seem to limit the list to patrons who 
> reached $25.00 at that time. The lists I do get have wrong owed amounts shown 
> (most owe well under $25.00), and there can be 9 or more pages of patron 
> lists to check. It seems like there should be a way to find patrons with a 
> specific Total Owed amount in a specific time frame.
> 
> Thank you for adding this question to the list serv!
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Dawn Fritz - Circulation Manager Bethlehem Area Public Library
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Diane Disbro <ddis...@scenicregional.org> 
>> wrote:
>> Good afternoon –
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We are trying to find patrons who owe us more than $100. I ran the report 
>> Patrons with outstanding balances by branch and item due date range. There 
>> are 22,000 lines on the report, one for each billed item. Some of the items 
>> are not overdue/lost. Some of the patrons in the report do not owe us money. 
>> I have looked through most of the patrons with last names beginning with A, 
>> B, and C and found $15,000 owed to us. But it is a painfully slow process, 
>> looking for patrons with multiple billing lines and checking their records 
>> for totals. Then copying their information to a spreadsheet.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Has anyone else found this information by a quicker method?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Diane Disbro
>> 
>> Circulation Coordinator/Branch Manager
>> 
>> Union Branch
>> 
>> Scenic Regional Library
>> 
>> 308 Hawthorne Drive
>> 
>> Union, MO     63084
>> 
>> (636) 583-3224
>> 
>> www.scenicregional.org
>> 
> 

Reply via email to