> What I intend is to have the best performance and reliability storage as 
> cheaper as possible...
> So, I already tested the open-iscsi target and iniciator on a fedora 
> box. The results were not
> so good, the best result were with a fedora target and windows XP 
> iniciator.

Are your test results available? I would be curious to see what made the
Microsoft Software Initiator (v2.0?) faster than the Open-ISCSI one.

Both of them are software based so there shouldn't be a big difference
in the speed of them.

> In my inicial goal, I would like to have a linux box as a target and 
> Gbit NIC cards for acessing
> it. Putting four 500GB SATA II HD in a RAID10 assemble for reliability, 
> creating a 1TB redundant storage...
> The redundancy was nice with mdtools, but the performance with the 
> open-iscsi was not good...
> Speaking about the CPU load, as the storage will be a dedicated file 
> server, the whole CPU will
> be for file sharing and storage...

Right. That is unavoidable on the target side. I was thinking on the client
(initiator) where the data-gram check-summing would be offloaded to the HBA.

There is nothing you can do about the target side to off-load the check-summing
(well, not yet).

> So that´s why I am asking about the QLogic HBA´s...

If you go with the HBA, you will get the no CPU usage on your initiator (good)
and there won't be any extra overhead in unmarshalling TCP->iSCSI->SCSI. I don't
know how "much" faster it would be in doing I/O. If you go this route I would
advise on buying it with a return-back policy so that you can test it against 
software based initiators and if the I/O benchmarks don't make it look that 
sexy -
you can return the HBA.

Also be aware that the switches (or the lack of them) between your target and
initiator are important.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi

Reply via email to