Mike Christie wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> In case we are compiling against a newer kernel then what the out-of-tree
>> is expecting, Output to the user that use of in-tree modules are recommended.
>>
>> This will still fail the compilation. because we don't want to compile in 
>> that
>> case. But the user can see that this is an acceptable situation and he can 
>> proceed.
>>
>> [Mike we could: return with @exit 0 and let the Makefile attempt a 
>> compilation,
>>  but I think it is better this way?]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharr...@panasas.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/Makefile |    5 +++++
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
>> index b29cfed..9bfd5db 100644
>> --- a/kernel/Makefile
>> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ linux_2_6_28: $(unpatch_code)
>>  
>>  linux_2_6_29: $(unpatch_code)
>>  
>> +linux_2_6_%: $(unpatch_code)
>> +    @echo "Compiling against:" $@
>> +    @echo "With new Kernels, use iscsi modules that came with the Kernel"
>> +    @exit 1
>> +
> 
> This actually catches distro kernels.
> 

Yes it does, Drop it for now, I'll look into it.

Boaz

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to