Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> NexentaStor also is very good candidate for CIFS workgroups/AD
>> environments with the whole SMB stack implemented in the kernel, which
>> boosts performance over the top. And as far as iSCSI target - I would
>> recommend to use COMSTAR, which is ZFS integrated in Nexenta [2].
>
> Do you have any performance numbers available for the combination of
> open-iscsi and the NexentaStor target ?
This highly depends on HW used on both sides, and NexentaStor is HW
agnostic in a sense that it can be installed on any commodity x86
hardware. But out of the 4-core intel we've seen ~ 50k IOPS both
reads/writes.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
