On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Ulrich Windl
<ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> Considering that most remote iSCSI targets have "intelligece" of their own, 
> the
> use of a no-op i/O scheduler seems justified. I think multiple I/O schedulers 
> on
> both ends don't necessarily make things faster, unless there is a bunch of
> requests that can be compacted into one. Then throughput rises while response 
> may
> decline.

Is request merging implemented in the SCSI layer or in the I/O scheduler ?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi

Reply via email to