Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Ulrich Windl
> <> wrote:
>> Considering that most remote iSCSI targets have "intelligece" of their own, 
>> the
>> use of a no-op i/O scheduler seems justified. I think multiple I/O 
>> schedulers on
>> both ends don't necessarily make things faster, unless there is a bunch of
>> requests that can be compacted into one. Then throughput rises while 
>> response may
>> decline.
> Is request merging implemented in the SCSI layer or in the I/O scheduler ?

I/O scheduler.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to