> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel-boun...@open-fcoe.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-fcoe.org]
> On Behalf Of Mike Christie
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:05 AM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Cc: eric.w.multa...@intel.com; de...@open-fcoe.org
> Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [fcoemon PATCH v2 00/11] rfcoemon
> restructuring
> shyam_i...@dell.com wrote:
> > Shouldn't the requirement to administer DCB  be FCoE independent ?
> After
> > all DCB is required for other protocols like iscsi as well.
> >
> It is not required for iscsi. I think people are thinking it is going
> to
> be useful for iscsi though.

Uh Ok.. I meant DCB would be useful for both FCoE and iSCSI. On the
other hand it is a requirement for FCoE.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to