Folks, On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> I have used this method to fix several cases of broken sequence count > comparisons in a variety of contexts over the years, but this is the first > time for iscsi. On re-reading this, I think I may have left a false impression. I did not mean to imply that the implementation in iscsi is broken. To the contrary, it is the rare exception that is actually correct. It is just kind of obscure and needlessly complicated. I suppose RFC1982 is what really should be changed... -- Mark Rustad, LAN Access Division, Intel Corporation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
