Mike Christie <[email protected]> wrote: >> Under that constraint what you think could be the less tedious way to >> provide the kernel transport with the session.cmds_max set by the user?
> Modify the ep_connect event to pass it down. yep, sounds like we can't avoid that, actually I now realized that we also went that way on that "iscsi ifaces / multipathing / etc" multipathing related thread we had during September last year... let me review that thread and we can set a plan so the change serves both purposes. Or. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
