On 2011年08月18日 04:38, Mike Christie wrote:
> Did you actually hit this or just find it by searching the code?
I found it while I'm reading its source code.
Do I need to regenerate the patch?
>
>
> On 08/15/2011 07:37 PM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>> diff --git a/usr/strings.c b/usr/strings.c
>> index ee6a51c..6432c2c 100644
>> --- a/usr/strings.c
>> +++ b/usr/strings.c
>> @@ -97,11 +97,16 @@ int str_enlarge_data(struct str_buffer *s, int length)
>>
>> void str_remove_initial(struct str_buffer *s, int length)
>> {
>> - char *remaining = s->buffer + length;
>> - int amount = s->data_length - length;
>> -
>> - if (s && length) {
>> - memmove(s->buffer, remaining, amount);
>> + char *remaining;
>> + int amount;
>> +
>> + if (s && length) {
>> + remaining = s->buffer + length;
>> + amount = s->data_length - length;
>> + if (amount < 0)
>> + amount = 0;
>
> The formatting is off. We use 8 space tabs.
> So all this above needs to be tabbed over properly. Check out
> str_truncate_buffer below this function for an example or following the
> tabbing used in the function originally. Also after the "if" line then
> the next line should be tabbed over and not alinged with the "(".
>
>
>
>> + if (amount)
>> + memmove(s->buffer, remaining, amount);
>> s->data_length = amount;
>> s->buffer[amount] = '\0';
>
> So you can tell here the formatting is really off. The old code uses the
> old tabbing and so it makes it akward to read.
>
>
> Patch looks ok other than that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
