>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Christie <[email protected]> writes:
>> 2. report_opcode is optional in SPC-3, so it's possible that not all >> iscsi target support it. But is it correct for microsoft iSCSI target >> to reject the command rather than return it with normal SCSI >> response? Mike> The iscsi spec has the reason code "command not supported" so I Mike> guess it is ok for the target to do this. I do not think I have Mike> ever seen that reason code used in production level targets, so it Mike> is probably not common. It's kind of unfriendly to not send a check condition... Mike> I think we should implement handling in the iscsi layer for it. I Mike> can make a patch if you have not already. It would be awfully nice to get it turned into an ILLEGAL REQUEST/0x20/0x0. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
