On 04/08/2014 09:12 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 04/08/2014 02:35 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> I see that Boaz said AFAHK there are no commands under which AHS is >> expected on the reply, so just to >> make sure against faulty target we should skip it even if sent, agree? > > That sounds good. Just do something that will not cause a kernel crash > until a case we can test against comes up. >
I probably do not need to say this but please put a big scary kprint about "BAD TARGET please report" so we can see those if ever. Thanks Boaz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
