On 09/27/2016 03:50 AM, The Lee-Man wrote: > Christoph Hellwig suggested we do away with the open-iscsi google group > (this group) and use linux-scsi. > > Any thoughts on this? (removed others on the cc list). > Well, there still _is_ a reason to have a list for discussing open-iscsi userland. We have a similar situation on dm-devel, which is used to discuss both the kernel side (ie drivers/md/dm-*) and the userspace tooling. But I'm not really in favour of that; it's occasionally confusing if a particular post relies to the kernel or userland. So I'm more in favour to use linux-scsi for the kernel-related stuff and keep another group (like this one) for userland tools.
Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
